A multi-criteria choice of software based on ray diagrams is considered. This solves the problem of peer review and selection of antiviral drugs based on a balanced assessment of indicators of antivirals office applications, such as: performance, ergonomics and the pattern of completeness, self-defense, monitoring and others. Compared following antiviral drugs: Panda Cloud Antivirus, Kaspersky Internet Security, Norton Internet Security and Avira Free Antivirus. The representation of complex quality indicators in the form of polygons areas is considered. This significantly increases the visibility of a multidimensional comparison of antiviral tools.
multi-criteria choice of software, antiviral drugs, ray diagrams, decision-making
1. Mikoni S.V. Mnogokriterial'nyy vybor na konechnom mnozhestve al'ternativ / S.V. Mikoni. – SPb.: Lan', 2009. – 270 s.
2.
3. Saaty Th.L. The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hier-archies / Th.L. Saaty. — Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publ., 1992. — 496 p.
4.
5. Takagi T. Fuzzy Identification of Systems and Its Applications to Modeling and Control / T. Takagi, M. Sugeno // IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. – 1985. – Vol. 15, no. 1. – P. 116-132.
6.
7. Ma J. Decider: A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system / J. Ma, J. Lu, GQ. Zhang // Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. – 2010. – No. 23. – P. 23-31.
8.
9. Podinovskiy V.V. Teoriya vazhnosti kriteriev: sovremennoe sostoyanie i napravleniya dal'neyshego razvitiya / V.V. Podinovskiy, M.A. Potapov, A.P. Nelyubin, O.V. Podinovskiy // Tr. HII Vseros. soveschaniya po problemam upravleniya VSPU-14. – M., 2014. – S. 7697-7702.
10.
11. Bryakalov G.A. Osnovy sovremennyh komp'yuternyh tehnologiy: uchebnik / G.A. Bryakalov, S.V. Voycehovskiy, E.G. Vorob'ev i dr.; pod red. A.D. Homonenko. – SPb.: KORONA print, 2005. – 672 s.
12.
13. Ryzhikov Yu.I. Flotskie problemy i luchevye diagrammy / Yu.I. Ryzhikov, A.V. Alekseev, V.A. Lohvickiy // Sb. tr. III mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. «Imitacionnoe i kompleksnoe modelirovanie morskoy tehniki i morskih transportnyh sistem» – «IKM MTMTS 2015». – SPb., 2015. – S. 121-125.
14.
15. Gorshkov A.V. Metod vybora programmnogo obespecheniya sistem upravleniya versiyami / A.V. Gorshkov, A.D. Homonenko // Analiz i prognozirovanie sistem upravleniya v promyshlennosti i na transporte: tr. XVI mezhdunar. konf. molodyh uchenyh, studentov i aspirantov, SPb., 21-23 apr. 2015 g. – SPb.: FGBOU VPO PGUPS, 2016. – S. 125-132.
16.
17. Ahaev A.V. Metodika, modeli i algoritmy vybora programmnyh produktov na osnove ontologii i nechetkoy mery: avtoref. … kand. tehn. nauk / A.V. Ahaev. – Tomsk, 2014. – 19 s.
18.
19. Azadeh A. A robust decision-making methodology for evaluation and selection of simulation software package / A. Azadeh, S.N. Shirkouhi, K. Rezaie // Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. – 2010. – Vol. 47. – P. 381-393.
20.
21. Karaarslan N. An application for modular capability-based ERP software selection using AHP method / N. Karaarslan, E. Gundogar // Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. – 2009. – Vol. 42. – P. 1025-1033.
22.
23. Smirlis Y.G. Data envelopment analysis models to support the selection of vehicle routing software for city logis-tics operations / Y.G. Smirlis, V. Zeimpekis, G. Kaimakamis // Oper. Res. – 2012. – Vol. 12. – P. 399-420.
24.
25. Utkin L.V. Obobschenie metoda analiza ierarhiy dlya prinyatiya resheniya pri netochnyh sravneniyah s ispol'zovaniem teorii Dempstera – Sheyfera / L.V. Utkin, N.V. Simanova // Izv. OrelGTU. Seriya «Informacionnye sistemy i tehnologii». – 2007. – № 4/268 (535). – S. 223-227.
26.
27. Dempster A.P. Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multi-Valued Mapping / A.P. Dempster // Ann. Math. Stat. – 1967. – No. 38. – P. 325-339.
28.
29. Titov A.I. Vybor programmnogo obespecheniya s pomosch'yu algoritma Takagi – Sugeno na primere sistem upravleniya proektami / A.I. Titov, A.D. Homonenko // Nauch.-tehn. vedomosti Sankt-Peterburg. gos. politeh. un-ta. Informatika. Telekommunikacii. Upravlenie. – 2016. – № 1 (236). – S. 41-52.
30.
31. Hovanov N.V. Analiz i sintez pokazateley pri informacionnom deficite / N.V. Hovanov. – SPb.: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburg. un-ta, 1996. – 196 s.
32.
33. Kornienko A.A. Informacionnaya bezopasnost' i zaschita informacii na zheleznodorozhnom transporte. Ch. 2. Programmno-apparatnye sredstva obespecheniya informacionnoy bezopasnosti na zheleznodorozhnom transporte: ucheb. posobie / A.A. Kornienko, M.A. Eremeev, V.N. Kustov i dr. – M.: UMC po obrazovaniyu na zh.-d. transporte, 2014. – 448 s. (Ser. Vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie.)
34.
35. Gindin S.I. Model' ocenivaniya operativnosti raspredelennoy obrabotki dannyh s uchetom zatrat na obespechenie informacionnoy bezopasnosti / S.I. Gindin, A.D. Homonenko, V.V. Yakovlev, S.V. Matveev // Problemy informacionnoy bezopasnosti. Komp'yuternye sistemy. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 59-67.
36.
37. Kornienko A.A. Methodology of Conflict Detection and Resolution in Cyber Attacks Protection Software on Railway Transport / A.A. Kornienko, M.A. Polyanichko // Intellektual'nye tehnologii na transporte. – 2015. – № 1. – C. 18-21.
38.
39. Markov A.S. Modeli ocenki i planirovaniya ispytaniy programmnyh sredstv po trebovaniyam bezopasnosti informacii // Vestn. Moskov. gos. teh. un-ta im. N.E. Baumana. – 2011. – SPEC. – S. 90-103. (Ser. Priborostroenie.)
40.
41. Baranova E.K. Sravnitel'nyy analiz programmnogo instrumentariya dlya analiza i ocenki riskov informacionnoy bezopasnosti / E.K. Baranova, M.V. Chernova // Problemy informacionnoy bezopasnosti. Komp'yuternye sistemy. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 160-168.
