Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Purpose: To consider the possibility of automatic determination of the spark gap condition. Methods: The article analyzes devices and methods of automatic control of the spark gap condition. It also presents their features and disadvantages, based on which conclusions are made concerning the convenience of operation in production, the quality of the spark gap condition monitoring, the possibility of using the system in automatic control systems. Results: A new modernization of spark gaps is proposed, which will allow not only to organize automatic monitoring of their condition, but also to introduce automatic monitoring of spark gaps condition into the system of railway infrastructure monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles, which is currently the subject of special attention from the holding company JSC “Russian Railways”. The justifications for choosing this particaular new modernization include minimal capital investments, while maintaining the necessary and sufficient efficiency of spark gap monitoring. Also, there is the possibility of integration into the existing monitoring system with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles. Practical significance: The possibility of automatic determination of the spark gap condition is shown, which corresponds to the priority direction of digitalization of railway transport and railway infrastructure of the holding company JSC “Russian Railways”, specified in the holding company’s development strategies up to 2030 and in the perspective up to 2035.
Spark gap, automatic control, sparkover, unmanned aerial vehicles, digital railroad
1. Rasporyazhenie OAO «RZhD» ot 25 aprelya 2016 g. № 753r «Pravila tehnicheskogo soderzhaniya kontaktnoy seti, pitayuschih liniy, otsasyvayuschih liniy, shuntiruyuschih liniy i liniy elektroperedachi 1812r».
2. Ukazaniya po tehnicheskomu obsluzhivaniyu i remontu opornyh konstrukciy kontaktnoy seti (K-146-2002), MPS RF, departament elektrifikacii i elektrosnabzheniya; rukovodstvo po ekspluatacii pribora «Impul's».
3. K-146-2002 «Ukazaniya po tehnicheskomu obsluzhivaniyu i remontu opornyh konstrukciy kontaktnoy seti», MPS RF. - M.: Transizdat, 2003. - S. 12.
4. Patent № RU 69462 U1 Rossiyskaya Federaciya, MPK V60M 5/00, G01R 27/18. Ustroystvo kontrolya sostoyaniya iskrovogo promezhutka, ustanovlennogo v cepi zaschity zhelezobetonnyh opor kontaktnoy seti: № 2007128856/22: zayavl. 25.07.2007: opubl. 27.12.2007 / A. V. Dement'ev, V. A. Dement'ev, E. A. Lazarev i dr.; zayavitel' obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «Elektrodiagnost-Zheleznodorozhnik».
5. Patent № RU 2769631 C1 Rossiyskaya Federaciya, MPK G01R 31/08, H02H 9/06, G06K 7/0095. Sposob kontrolya iskrovogo promezhutka i sistema dlya ego osuschestvleniya: № 2021114989: zayavl. 25.05.2021: opubl.: 04.04.2022 / T. A. Nesenyuk, I. A. Pyateckiy; zayavitel' obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu «Ural'skiy centr diagnostiki oborudovaniya».
6. Ispol'zovanie bespilotnikov pomogaet snizit' rashody na monitoring zheleznodorozhnoy infrastruktury i povysit' kachestvo poluchaemyh dannyh. - URL: https://www.rzd-partner.ru/zhd-transport/opinions/ispolzovanie-bespilotnikov-pomogaet-snizit-raskhody-na-monitoring-zheleznodorozhnoy-infrastruktury-i/ (data obrascheniya: 24.07.2023).
