CHANGES IN THE NUMBER OF RAIL GAUGE CRIMES AFTER LAYING GEOSYNTHETICS UNDER THE SLEEPER BASE
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Purpose: To consider the effect of laying geosynthetic materials in the footplate on the geometry of the rail track. Methods: The paper uses methods for evaluating the geometry of the rail track by track measuring cars. For the extracurricular high speed line St. Petersburg — Moscow and for the heavy-duty line Moscow — Smolensk — Minsk, the parameters of the rail track geometry were evaluated for sections with geosynthetic materials and control sections laid in the construction of the base. The summative indicator of the geometry state was the indicator of the reduced amount of deviations (PSO). Results: In the first year or two after repair, regardless of the presence of geosynthetic material, the stabilization of the track is proceeding at the same pace and by the third year of operation, the level of PSO is on average 4.9 pcs/km. Further, the standard design shows an increase in PSO, and by the 6th year reaches a value of 6.9 pcs/km, and then decreases, which is explained by the average repair during this period. For the rail track with geosynthetic material, the level of PSO is steadily decreasing and by the 7th — 10th year reaches a value of 3.45 pcs/km. After the fourth year of operation, the average score for sections reinforced with geomaterials is no more than 85% of the average score for sections of the track without reinforcement. Practical significance: Stabilization of the track base with geosynthetic materials makes it possible to achieve uniformity of precipitation in the longitudinal axis of the path, which naturally will not lead to a significant distortion of the longitudinal profile and of course will reduce the cost of the current maintenance of the rail track by reducing the number of track realigning by about half.

Keywords:
Sleeper bearing, stabilization, geosynthetic materials, track meters, amount of deviations
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Serebryakov D. V. Issledovanie vliyaniya konstrukciy peremennoy zhestkosti na nesuschuyu sposobnost' zemlyanogo polotna v zone sopryazhe-niya s mostami / D. V. Serebryakov // Aktual'nye problemy razvitiya transportnoy infrastruktury: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. - 2018. - S. 27-33.

2. Kolos A. Reducing of negative heavy axle load impact on the railway track structure / A. Kolos, A. Petriaev, I. Kolos et al. // AIP Conference Pro-ceedings. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference on Railway Transport and Engineering, RTE 2021. - 2021. - P. 060007.

3. Petryaev A. V. Raschetnyy analiz povedeniya podshpal'nogo osnovaniya pri ego stabilizacii geosinteticheskimi materialami / A. V. Petryaev, V. N. Paramonov // Transport Urala. - 2022. - № 1(72). - S. 62-67.

4. Petryaev A. V. K voprosu o prakticheskom prilozhenii metoda konech-nyh elementov dlya raschetov napryazhenno-deformiruemogo sostoyaniya armogruntovyh konstrukciy / A. V. Petryaev, I. N. Zhuravlev // Prime-nenie geomaterialov pri stroitel'stve i rekonstrukcii transportnyh ob'ektov: materialy III Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-tehnicheskoy konferen-cii. Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet putey soobscheniya Im-peratora Aleksandra I. - 2013. - S. 101-104.

5. Brown S. F. Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid rein-forcement of railway ballas / S. F. Brown, J. Kwan, N. H. Thom // Geotex-tiles and Geomembranes - 2007. - № 25. - Pp. 326-335.

6. Esmaeili M. Laboratory and field investigation of the effect of geogrid-reinforced ballast on railway track lateral resistance / M. Esmaeili, J. A. Zakeri, M. Babaei // Geotextiles and Geomembranes. - 2017. - № 45(2). - Pp. 23-33.

7. Indraratna B. Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling / B. Indraratna, N. T. Ngo, C. Rujikiatkamjorn // Geotextiles and Geomembranes. - 2011. - № 29(3). - Pp. 313-322.

8. Gobel C. H. Effectiveness of a reinforcing geogrid in a railway subbase under dynamic loads / C. H. Gobel, U. C. Weisemann, R. A. Kirschner // Geotextiles and Geomembranes. - 1994. - № 13(2). - Pp. 91-99.

9. Kwan J. Geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast / J. Kwan. - Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK. - 2006. - 195 p.

10. Sharpe P. Geogrid trials at soppull moor on the west coast main line / P. Sharpe, M. J. Brough, J. Dixon // Proceedings of Railway foundations con-ference: Railfound 06, University of Birmingham, UK. - 2006. - P. 375.

11. Ishikawa T. Application of the UIUC model for predicting ballast set-tlement to unsaturated ballasts under moving wheel loads / T. Ishikawa, T. Li, T. Yang et al. //Transportation Geotechnics. - 2019. - № 18. - Pp. 149-162.

12. Instrukciya po rasshifrovke lent i ocenke sostoyaniya rel'sovoy ko-lei po pokazaniyam puteizmeritel'nogo vagona CNII-2 i meram po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti dvizheniya poezdov. - Utv. MPS RF ot 14 ok-tyabrya 1997 g. № CP-515. - M..: MPS RF, 1997. - 57 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?