COMPARISON OF REQUIREMENTS FOR STANDARDS OF DIFFERENT COUNTRIES TO ASSESSMENT OF FREIGHT CAR DYNAMIC QUALITIES AND IMPACT ON TRACK
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Purpose: To analyze and compare the requirements of State Standards of Russia, countries of Europe and North America to assessment of dynamic qualities of freight cars, their impact on railway track. Methods: Review and analysis of requirements of various countries to conditions to pursue testing of freight cars on dynamic qualities and their impact on a track, requirements to indicator permissible values made it possible to form the most representative calculated cases for simulation of railway crew motion along various construction tracks (straight, curve sections) and to pursue the study of freight car dynamics with the help of computer simulation modelling in program complex "Universal Mechanism". Results: The comparison of various country’s requirements to the assessment of freight car dynamic behavior is made. Using computer simulation methods, oscillograms of various indicators (forces, accelerations, coefficients) for universal gondola car, installed on bogies of 18-100 model, at its motion along various construction tracks were obtained. The advantages and flaws of used approaches to assess dynamic qualities, indicators of crew impact on various country’s track are shown. Practical significance: The work obtained results can be used to improve the system of railway crew dynamic behavior assessment and its impact on a track with the purpose to improve the safety of freight car motion in Russia.

Keywords:
Freight car, gondola car, car motion simulation, dynamic qualities, impact on track, wheel derailment resistance
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Boronenko Yu. P. Osobennosti dinamiki vagona-cisterny s zhidkim gruzom / Yu. P. Boronenko, Yu. B. Zhitkov // Izvestiya Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobscheniya. SPb.: PGUPS. - 2017. - T. 14. - № 4. - S. 597-604.

2. Goncharov S. E. Sravnitel'naya ocenka vozdeystviya na put' i soprotivleniya dvizheniyu innovacionnyh vagonov i vagonov ustarevshih konstrukciy metodami komp'yuternogo modelirovaniya / S. E. Goncharov, D. Yu. Pogorelov, V. A. Simonov // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 36-45.

3. Saidova A. V. Sovremennye metody modelirovaniya dinamiki podvizhnogo sostava: elektronnoe uchebnoe posobie / A. V. Saidova, Yu. B. Zhitkov. - SPb.: FGBOU VO PGUPS, 2022. - 52 s.

4. Cherkashin Yu. M. Vliyanie parametrov ekipazhey i puti na bezopasnost' dvizheniya poezdov / Yu. M. Cherkashin, D. Yu. Pogorelov, V. A. Simonov // Vestnik VNIIZhT. - 2010. - № 2. - S. 3-9.

5. GOST 33211-2014. Vagony gruzovye. Trebovaniya k prochnosti i dinamicheskim kachestvam. - M.: Standartinform, 2014.

6. GOST 33788-2016. Vagony gruzovye i passazhirskie. Metody ispytaniy na prochnost' i dinamicheskie kachestva. - M.: Standartinform, 2016.

7. GOST 34759-2021. Zheleznodorozhnyy podvizhnoy sostav. Normy dopustimogo vozdeystviya na zheleznodorozhnyy put' i metody ispytaniy. - M.: Standartinform, 2022.

8. PNST 511-2020. Vagony gruzovye. Raschetnye nerovnosti zheleznodorozhnogo puti dlya ocenki pokazateley dinamicheskih kachestv gruzovyh vagonov raschetnymi metodami. - M.: Standartinform, 2021.

9. RD 32.68-96. Raschetnye nerovnosti zheleznodorozhnogo puti dlya ispol'zovaniya pri issledovaniyah i proektirovanii passazhirskih i gruzovyh vagonov. - M.: MPS, 1996.

10. Specification M-976. Truck Performance for Rail Cars (Last Revised: 2019).

11. Specification M-1001. Design, Fabrication, and construction of freight cars (Last Revised: 2019).

12. UIC Code 518. Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour - Safety - Track fatigue - Running behaviour, 4th edition, 2009.

13. DIN EN 14363:2016. European Standard Railway applications - Testing and Simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles - Testing of running behavior and stationary tests.

14. Blohin E. P. Graficheskoe predstavlenie kriteriya Nadalya / E. P. Blohin, M. L. Korotenko, I. V. Klimenko // Visnik Dnipropetrovs'kogo nacional'nogo universitetu zaliznichnogo transportu im. akademika V. Lazaryana. - 2010. - № 35. - S. 7-9.

15. Antonov A. Yu. O vnesenii izmeneniy v raschetnye formuly metodiki ocenki vozdeystviya podvizhnogo sostava na put' po usloviyu obespecheniya ego nadezhnosti / A. Yu. Antonov, I. I. Ivanov // Izvestiya Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobscheniya. SPb.: PGUPS, 2019 - T. 16. - Vyp. 1. - S. 31-36.

16. Orlova A. M. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii dopuskaemyh skorostey dvizheniya zheleznodorozhnyh ekipazhey na seti dorog RF / A. M. Orlova, A. V. Saidova, E. A. Rudakova i dr. // Vestnik IPEM: Tehnika zheleznyh dorog. - 2019. - Vyp. 3(47). - S. 52-60.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?