Purpose: To consider the matter on the necessity to apply mortgage-investment analysis method for to assess market value of lands burdened with outstanding loans. To show the possibility to write down calculation formulas both given and not-given changes in a net operating income and in an asset value of being estimated land; to offer calculation formula variants for mortgage-investment analysis traditional techniques. To give recommendations on the assessment of price-forming indicator series. To classify mortgage-investment analysis method at its application for land market value cost evaluation. Methods: Market comparisons; mortgage-investment analysis; capitalization of land rent; capitalization by calculation models of assumed usage, investment group, debt coverage coefficient. Akerson, Elwood, residue. Results: The need to improve the methodology parameters is indicated. It’s established which calculation formulas of the methodology require an actualization due to the changes occurred in a land rent since the moment of initial definition of the values of given quantities. To increase the calculation result reliability it’s necessary to account for a big variability of the land exploitation conditions. Practical importance: There is given a composition for the method of capitalization by calculating models. The possibility to write down calculating formulas both given and not given changes of net operating income and asset value of being estimated land is demonstrated. It is proposed application sphere expansion for land rent capitalization method. The methodologies can be recommended for a practical use.
Real estate, land, market value, assessment approaches and methods, mortgage-investment analysis method, net operating income, capitalization coefficient, borrowed funds
1. Prikaz Ministerstva ekonomicheskogo razvitiya i torgovli RF ot 20 iyulya 2007 g. N 256 "Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo standarta ocenki "Obschie ponyatiya ocenki, podhody k ocenke i trebovaniya k provedeniyu ocenki (FSO N 1)";
2. Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 20.05.2015 N 298 «Cel' ocenki i vidy stoimosti (FSO № 2)»;
3. Prikaz Ministerstva ekonomicheskogo razvitiya i torgovli RF ot 20 iyulya 2007 g. N 254 "Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo standarta ocenki "Trebovaniya k otchetu ob ocenke (FSO N 3)";
4. Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 25.09.2014 N 611 “Ocenka nedvizhimosti (FSO № 7)”;
5. Rasporyazhenie Minimuschestva Rossii ot 07.03.2002 g. № 568-r “Metodicheskie rekomendacii po opredeleniyu rynochnoy stoimosti zemel'nyh uchastkov”;
6. Rasporyazhenie Minimuschestva RF ot 10 aprelya 2003 goda N 1102-r «Ob utverzhdenii Metodicheskih rekomendaciy po opredeleniyu rynochnoy stoimosti prava arendy zemel'nyh uchastkov»;
7. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po ocenke effektivnosti investicionnyh proektov: (Vtoraya redakciya)/M-vo ekon. RF, M-vo fin. RF, GK po str-vu, arhit. i zhil. Politike; ruk. avt. kol.: Kossov V.V., Livshic V.I., Shahnazarov A.G. - M.: OAO “NPO “Izd-vo “Ekonomika”, 2000. - 421 s.;
8. Fridman D., Orduey N. Analiz i ocenka prinosyaschey dohod nedvizhimosti. Per. s angl., - M.: «Delo Ltd», 1995 g. - 480 s.;
9. Battisti, F., Campo, O. A model for determining a discount rate in market value assessment of buildable areas subject to restrictions / Green Energy and Technology, 2021, Pages 303-314. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49579-4_20;
10. Dzhozef N. Martin, Mark V. Sassman. Obzor metodov polucheniya polnoy normy kapitalizacii (Dvenadcat' formul polnoy normy). Voprosy ocenki, 1997, № 3, s. 8-15;
11. Gribovskiy S.V. Ocenka stoimosti nedvizhimosti: Uchebnoe posobie. - M.: Maroseyka, 2009. - 432 s.;
12. Gribovskiy S.V., Zhukovskiy V.V., Tabala D.V. Stavka diskontirovaniya - ne igra voobrazheniya, a strogaya nauka. Opyt opredeleniya stavki diskontirovaniya metodom ekstrakcii. Voprosy ocenki, 1997, № 3, s. 21-29;
13. Ozerov E.S. Ekonomika i menedzhment nedvizhimosti. - SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «MKS», 2007 g. - 422 s.;
14. Tarasevich E.I. Ocenka nedvizhimosti. - SPb GTU, SPb, 1997 g. - 422 s.
