SPECIFICITIES OF WORK OF RAILWAY PERMANENT WAY IN CONDITIONS OF CONTINUOUS WINTER PERIOD
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Purpose: To determine legitimacies of changes in technical state of railway permanent way in the areas with harsh climate conditions with the purpose to design track maintenance system in the Arctic conditions. Methods: During the study, an analysis of main indicators of permanent way (upper construction) technical condition was carried out such as the way’s element defectiveness (rails, fastenings, sleepers, ballast pollution) and faults of geometric parameter norms of rail track (widenings and narrowings, alignment by a level, sags, subsidences, position in a plan). Data analysis was carried out in accordance with specially created model of the dependence of changes in the parameters of permanent way technical condition from a workload tonnage inclusive of annual periods. Results: Based on the observations, the change in track maintenance costs for the lines located in continuous winter conditions was determined. These are costs, related to railway track faults and defectiveness of track superstructure (permanent way) elements. Practical importance: The results of the study ‘re intended for the work planning system development on track maintenance and repairs in harsh climate conditions.

Keywords:
Arctic zone, permanent way, track maintenance system in a harsh climate, track maintenance costs
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Mishin V. V. Veroyatnostno-statisticheskiy analiz perekosa i prosadok rel'sovoy kolei // Vestnik VNIIZhT. 2004. №4. S. 31-36..

2. Prognozirovanie sostoyaniya puti. problemy i resheniya // Put' i putevoe hozyaystvo, 2011 № 7, s. 2-6.

3. Improving the Railway Stability in the Joint Zone for Modern Operating Conditions Transportation Research Procedia, 2 March 2021 Victor Pevzner Valerii Kaplin

4. Kumar, S. A Study of the Rail Degradation Process to Predict Rail Breaks, Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 2006, pp. 47-59.

5. Zoeteman. A., Coenraad. E. Evaluating Track Structures: Life Cycle Cost Analysis as a Structured Approach. Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2000

6. Patra, A. RAMS and LCC in Rail Track Maintenance, Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 2007, pp. 37-71.

7. Asalkhanova, Karpov, Kolisnichenko Development of Strategies for Analysing the Factors which Influence the Organization of Routine Railway Track Maintenance Transportation Research Procedia3 February 2022Volume 61 (Cover date: 2022)Pages 582-587

8. Smerdov, Klementyev Indicators of Reliability of Artificial Structures with Elements Made of Polymer Composite Materials at all Stages of their Life Cycle on the Basis of Risk Assessment. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017. Volume 20, rr 624-629

9. Beltiukov, Shehtman, Malikov Evaluation of Effectiveness of Separating Layers in Railroad Track Structure Using Life Cycle Cost Analysis Procedia Engineering2017

10. Beltiukov V., Andreev A., Sennikova A. Analysis of Changes of Track Upper Structure Technical Condition and its Operation Costs in Regions with Long Winter Period for Different Types of Rail Fastenings // Transportation Soil Engineering in Cold Regions (Lecture notes in Civil Engineering), 2020, Vol. 1, pp. 265-274. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0450-1_27, eid: 2-s2.0-85078149994

Login or Create
* Forgot password?