Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track

Alina Saidova; Artem V. Gusev; Ekaterina A. Rudakova

doi:10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160

UDC 629.4.017 UDC 625.03

2 more Collapse

COMPARISON OF REQUIREMENTS FOR STANDARDS OF DIFFERENT COUNTRIES TO ASSESSMENT OF FREIGHT CAR DYNAMIC QUALITIES AND IMPACT ON TRACK Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track

АА Аа

Published in Bulletin of scientific research results · Volume 2023, Issue 1 · Pages 147–160 · Rubric: HIGH TECHNOLOGIES FOR TRANSPORT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160

Received: 26.03.2023 Accepted: 27.03.2023 Published: 27.03.2023

Authors

Alina Saidova

Artem V. Gusev

Ekaterina A. Rudakova

Alina Saidova

Academic degree: candidate of technical sciences

Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University Russian Federation · Saint-Petersburg

Artem V. Gusev

Academic degree: candidate of technical sciences

LLC All-Union Research and Development Centre for Transport Technologies Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Rudakova

Academic degree: candidate of technical sciences

LLC All-Union Research and Development Centre for Transport Technologies Russian Federation

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To analyze and compare the requirements of State Standards of Russia, countries of Europe and North America to assessment of dynamic qualities of freight cars, their impact on railway track. Methods: Review and analysis of requirements of various countries to conditions to pursue testing of freight cars on dynamic qualities and their impact on a track, requirements to indicator permissible values made it possible to form the most representative calculated cases for simulation of railway crew motion along various construction tracks (straight, curve sections) and to pursue the study of freight car dynamics with the help of computer simulation modelling in program complex "Universal Mechanism". Results: The comparison of various country’s requirements to the assessment of freight car dynamic behavior is made. Using computer simulation methods, oscillograms of various indicators (forces, accelerations, coefficients) for universal gondola car, installed on bogies of 18-100 model, at its motion along various construction tracks were obtained. The advantages and flaws of used approaches to assess dynamic qualities, indicators of crew impact on various country’s track are shown. Practical significance: The work obtained results can be used to improve the system of railway crew dynamic behavior assessment and its impact on a track with the purpose to improve the safety of freight car motion in Russia.

KEYWORDS

Freight car, gondola car, car motion simulation, dynamic qualities, impact on track, wheel derailment resistance

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Boronenko Yu. P. Osobennosti dinamiki vagona-cisterny s zhidkim gruzom / Yu. P. Boronenko, Yu. B. Zhitkov // Izvestiya Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobscheniya. SPb.: PGUPS. - 2017. - T. 14. - № 4. - S. 597-604.

2. Goncharov S. E. Sravnitel'naya ocenka vozdeystviya na put' i soprotivleniya dvizheniyu innovacionnyh vagonov i vagonov ustarevshih konstrukciy metodami komp'yuternogo modelirovaniya / S. E. Goncharov, D. Yu. Pogorelov, V. A. Simonov // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 36-45.

3. Saidova A. V. Sovremennye metody modelirovaniya dinamiki podvizhnogo sostava: elektronnoe uchebnoe posobie / A. V. Saidova, Yu. B. Zhitkov. - SPb.: FGBOU VO PGUPS, 2022. - 52 s.

4. Cherkashin Yu. M. Vliyanie parametrov ekipazhey i puti na bezopasnost' dvizheniya poezdov / Yu. M. Cherkashin, D. Yu. Pogorelov, V. A. Simonov // Vestnik VNIIZhT. - 2010. - № 2. - S. 3-9.

5. GOST 33211-2014. Vagony gruzovye. Trebovaniya k prochnosti i dinamicheskim kachestvam. - M.: Standartinform, 2014.

6. GOST 33788-2016. Vagony gruzovye i passazhirskie. Metody ispytaniy na prochnost' i dinamicheskie kachestva. - M.: Standartinform, 2016.

7. GOST 34759-2021. Zheleznodorozhnyy podvizhnoy sostav. Normy dopustimogo vozdeystviya na zheleznodorozhnyy put' i metody ispytaniy. - M.: Standartinform, 2022.

8. PNST 511-2020. Vagony gruzovye. Raschetnye nerovnosti zheleznodorozhnogo puti dlya ocenki pokazateley dinamicheskih kachestv gruzovyh vagonov raschetnymi metodami. - M.: Standartinform, 2021.

9. RD 32.68-96. Raschetnye nerovnosti zheleznodorozhnogo puti dlya ispol'zovaniya pri issledovaniyah i proektirovanii passazhirskih i gruzovyh vagonov. - M.: MPS, 1996.

10. Specification M-976. Truck Performance for Rail Cars (Last Revised: 2019).

11. Specification M-1001. Design, Fabrication, and construction of freight cars (Last Revised: 2019).

12. UIC Code 518. Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour - Safety - Track fatigue - Running behaviour, 4th edition, 2009.

13. DIN EN 14363:2016. European Standard Railway applications - Testing and Simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles - Testing of running behavior and stationary tests.

14. Blohin E. P. Graficheskoe predstavlenie kriteriya Nadalya / E. P. Blohin, M. L. Korotenko, I. V. Klimenko // Visnik Dnipropetrovs'kogo nacional'nogo universitetu zaliznichnogo transportu im. akademika V. Lazaryana. - 2010. - № 35. - S. 7-9.

15. Antonov A. Yu. O vnesenii izmeneniy v raschetnye formuly metodiki ocenki vozdeystviya podvizhnogo sostava na put' po usloviyu obespecheniya ego nadezhnosti / A. Yu. Antonov, I. I. Ivanov // Izvestiya Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobscheniya. SPb.: PGUPS, 2019 - T. 16. - Vyp. 1. - S. 31-36.

16. Orlova A. M. K voprosu ob ustanovlenii dopuskaemyh skorostey dvizheniya zheleznodorozhnyh ekipazhey na seti dorog RF / A. M. Orlova, A. V. Saidova, E. A. Rudakova i dr. // Vestnik IPEM: Tehnika zheleznyh dorog. - 2019. - Vyp. 3(47). - S. 52-60.

GOST

Saidova A. V., Gusev A. V., Rudakova E. A. Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track // Bulletin of scientific research results. 2023. no. 1. pp. 147-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160. (Date of access 24.10.2026).

MLA

Alina Saidova, Gusev A. V., Rudakova E. A.. "Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track." Bulletin of scientific research results 2023.1 (2023): 147-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160.

APA

Saidova A. V., Gusev A. V., Rudakova E. A. (2023). Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track. Bulletin of scientific research results, 2023(1), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160

Chicago

Alina Saidova, Gusev A. V., Rudakova E. A.. "Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track." Bulletin of scientific research results 2023, no. 1 (2023): 147-160. https://doi.org/10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Saidova A. V., Gusev A. V., Rudakova E. A. | title = Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track | journal = Bulletin of scientific research results | year = 2023 | volume = 2023 | issue = 1 | pages = 147-160 | doi = 10.20295/2223-9987-2023-1-147-160 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

COMPARISON OF REQUIREMENTS FOR STANDARDS OF DIFFERENT COUNTRIES TO ASSESSMENT OF FREIGHT CAR DYNAMIC QUALITIES AND IMPACT ON TRACK Comparison of Requirements for Standards of Different Countries to Assessment of Freight Car Dynamic Qualities and Impact on Track

Confirmation