Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Purpose: approaches to the maintenance of the railway track play a significant role in the interaction between the track and the rolling stock. The analysis [1–10] shows that existing methods for assessing the impact of rolling stock on the track have not completely resolved the issues of taking into account the residual deformation of the track, which does not allow us to have the most complete understanding of the ongoing interactions and processes between the railway track and the rolling stock in real operating conditions. In developing the issue of the need to take into account the residual deformation of the track, deviations in the geometry of the rail track in the profile, the article considers the “intrinsic” stresses in the track that are not under the influence of any load, arising as a result of the operation of a railway track with deviations in its contents. Methods: statistical analysis of the accumulation of residual deformations of a section of the railway track, review of existing methods for assessing the impact of rolling stock on the track, simulation modeling of the stress-strain state of the rail. Results: an analysis of the accumulation of residual deformations of a section of the railway track, a review of existing methods for assessing the impact of rolling stock on the track, modeling of the stress-strain state of a rail under load in two states (straight beam, curved beam) were carried out. Practical significance: the results can be applied when solving the problem of interaction between rolling stock and the railway track.
railway track, superstructure of the track, rail, calculation of the railway track, own stresses, subsidence of the railway track
1. Pravila proizvodstva raschetov zheleznodorozhnogo puti na prochnost' // Litograf, izdatel'stvo MPS, 1954.
2. Verigo M. F. Dinamicheskie issledovaniya puti i korrektirovka pravil raschetov zheleznodorozhnogo puti na prochnost' // Trudy VNIIZhT (vy- pusk № 466). M.: Transport, 1972. 192 s.
3. Gasanov A. I. O privedennoy masse puti // Vestnik CNII MPS (vypusk № 6). 1968. S. 52–53.
4. Medel' V. B. Vzaimodeystvie elektrovoza i puti // M.: Transzheldorizdat, 1956. 335 s.
5. Popov A. A. K voprosu o dinamicheskom vozdeystvii kolesa na rel's pri prohozhdenii nerovnosti puti // Trudy CNII MPS (vypusk № 33). 1949.
6. Shmidt K. M. Vliyanie massy puti na deformaciyu ego pri udare kolesa s podressorennym gruzom: sb. NII puti i putevogo hozyaystva M.: Transzheldorizdat, 1941. S. 87–109.
7. Metodika ocenki vozdeystviya podvizhnogo sostava na put' po usloviyam obespecheniya ego nadezhnosti, utv. MPS RF № CPT–52/14 ot 16.06.2000 g. Moskva, 2000. 40 s.
8. Metodika ocenki vozdeystviya podvizhnogo sostava na put' po usloviyam obespecheniya ego nadezhnosti, utv. rasporyazheniem OAO «RZhD» ot 22.12.2017 № 2706r.
9. Danilov V. N. Zheleznodorozhnyy put' i ego vzaimodeystvie s podvizhnym sostavom // M.: Trans- zheldorizdat, 1961. 70 s.
10. Danilov V. N. Raschet rel'sovoy niti v zone styka // Trudy VNIIZhT (vypusk 70). 1973. S. 43–59.
11. Grechanik A.V. Ocenka vliyaniya zhestkosti puti i ressornogo podveshivaniya telezhek na razvitie ostatochnyh deformaciy puti: avtoref. diss. ... \kand. tehn. nauk, 2011.
12. Instrukciya po tekuschemu soderzhaniyu zheleznodorozhnogo puti, utv. rasporyazheniem OAO «RZhD» ot 14.11.2016 № 2288r.
13. Shahunyanc G. M. Zheleznodorozhnyy put'. M.: Transzheldorizdat, 1961. 615 s.
