Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The article provides a multivariate approach to the selection of options for the outline of a network polygon in a poorly developed area. When developing deposits of natural resources, it is necessary to qualitatively carry out a comprehensive assessment of the sustainability of the development of the relevant region and develop strategies for its development. An underdeveloped area can be classified as a problem region, which includes underdeveloped or depressed areas. By underdeveloped areas (regions), the authors understand the territories of a large area inhabited by a small population, poorly developed or completely absent railway network of communication routes on the one hand, and on the other, there are rich reserves of deposits of natural resources that cannot be fully exploited. To assess the prospective development of the railway network in such areas, taking into account its socio-economic development, it is proposed to use a multi-criteria approach. The main provisions of the methodology for the formation of options for creating a railway network using graph theory and their consistent multi-criteria evaluation are presented. A specific calculation example is given, showing the efficiency of the proposed methodology.
railways, topology of the railway network, communication routes, problem regions, underdeveloped area, graph theory, depressed area, multi-criteria task, justification for the creation of a railway network
1. Kibalov E. B. Problema transportnogo osvoeniya Sibiri: zheleznodorozhnye proekty XXI veka // Transport Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2006. № 4. S. 10–13.
2. Tkachenko V. Ya., Malov V. Yu. Severo-Rossiyskiy transportnyy koridor — prioritetnyy ob'ekt razvitiya opornoy transportnoy seti strany // Transportnoe stroitel'stvo. 2007. № 4. S. 4–7.
3. Kopylenko V. A., Bykov Yu. A., Kruglov V. M. i dr. Severnye i vostochnye rayony Rossii — vazhneyshiy poligon rasshireniya seti zheleznyh dorog strany v XXI veke // Transportnoe stroitel'stvo. 2008. № 4. S. 2–4.
4. Shvarcfel'd V. S., Edigaryan A. R., Baranova V. V. Perspektivy razvitiya zheleznyh dorog Yuzhnoy Yakutii // Proektirovanie razvitiya regional'noy seti zheleznyh dorog. 2019. № 7. S. 6–16.
5. Krivko S. R. Tipy problemnyh regionov RF i predposylki ih suschestvovaniya // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2012. № 11. S. 317–322.
6. Medvedeva N. A., Shvarcfel'd V. S. Formirovanie i otbor variantov topologii seti zheleznyh dorog v maloosvoennyh regionah // Izvestiya Transsiba. 2023. № 3 (55). S. 66–73.
7. Medvedeva N. A., Shvarcfel'd V. S. Obosnovanie sozdaniya topologii seti zheleznyh dorog v maloosvoennyh rayonah / Transport: problemy, idei, perspektivy: sbornik trudov LXXXIII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-tehnicheskoy konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh, Sankt-Peterburg, 17–24 aprelya 2023 goda // SPb.: Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet putey soobscheniya Imperatora Aleksandra I. 2023. T. 1. S. 357–362. EDN PDTKOH.
8. Shvarcfel'd V. S., Medvedeva N. A. Model' razvitiya seti zheleznyh dorog v maloosvoennyh rayonah / IV Betankurovskiy mezhdunarodnyy inzhenernyy forum: elektronnyy sbornik trudov, Sankt-Peterburg, 30 noyabrya — 2 dekabrya 2022 goda // SPb: Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet putey soobscheniya Imperatora Aleksandra I, 2022. S. 402–404. EDN VJXLOT.
9. Podverbnyy V. A., Kazarina V. V. Mnogokriterial'nyy vybor napravleniya proektiruemoy zheleznoy dorogi // Transportnoe stroitel'stvo. 2019. № 3. S. 2–5. EDN HCYQSH.
10. Kazarina V. V., Podverbnyy V. A. Prinyatie resheniya po vyboru varianta trassy zheleznodorozhnoy linii // Mir transporta. 2019. T. 17, № 3 (82). S. 140–151. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30932/1992–3252-2019-17-3-140-151. EDN NQLQXP.
11. Perelygina A. A., Podverbnyy V. A. Primer prinyatiya resheniya v oblasti proektirovaniya zheleznyh dorog // Transportnaya infrastruktura Sibirskogo regiona. 2018. T. 1. S. 606–611. EDN XSHYZF.
12. Bykov Yu. A., Fadeeva V. A., Kozhevnikov V. V. Mnogofaktornyy analiz konkurentosposobnosti variantov napravleniya proektiruemyh zheleznyh dorog //Proektirovanie razvitiya regional'noy seti zheleznyh dorog. 2019. № 7. S. 154–161. EDN ZUCPBA.
13. Bykov Yu. A., Sidrakov A. A., Fadeeva V. A. Fohmirovanie mnozhestva variantov napravleniya proektiruemyh zheleznyh dorog i ocenka ih konkurentosposobnosti // Kachestvo. Innovacii. Obrazovanie. 2020. № 1 (165). S. 44–49. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31145/1999- 513x-2020-1-44-49. EDN YSCVTY.
